Ekiti State Governor-elect, Ayo Fayose
Two
Senior Advocates of Nigeria- Norrisom Quakers and M.J. Onigbanjo- have
dragged the Peoples Democratic Party and Ekiti State-governor-elect,
Ayodele Fayose, to the National Human Rights Commission over alleged
violation of their rights to practise as lawyers.
In a petition dated September 29 and
jointly signed by them, they claimed that the September 22 and 25
attacks on the Ekiti High Court by some suspected political thugs
constituted threats to their lives.
Quakers and Onigbanjo, who are the
lawyers to the litigants challenging Fayose’s eligibility to contest
in the June 21 governorship election, addressed their petition to the
Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Prof. Bem Angwe.
The National Judicial Council had at its
emergency meeting on September 16 asked the Inspector-General of Police,
Suleiman Abbah,to investigate the attacks on the court and prosecute
those behind it.
The Nigerian Bar Association had also
said it would send an investigative team to the state to unravel those
behind the incident and bring them to justice.
In their petition, Quakers and
Onigbanjo urged the rights commission to use its wherewithal to
investigate the attacks on the court.
They said the NHRC should unearth “those
behind this shameful display of banditry and gross violation of human
rights with a view to prosecuting and bringing them to justice.”
The petitioners accused the PDP of
organising the political thugs that invaded the high court premises on
September 22 and attacked Justice Olusegun Ogunyemi.
The attackers reportedly regrouped on September 25 to disrupt the hearing of a petition challenging the election of Fayose.
Quakers and Onigbanjo described the
September 22 incident as “barbaric and barefaced violation of the
constitutionally guaranteed rights of the claimants (litigants),
claimants’ counsel, the judge and other officers of the court by thugs
who were organised by the PDP.”
Part of the petition reads, “We are
therefore apprehensive for our safety and that of our legal team’s
lives, the dignity of our human persons, our right to practise our
profession and our clients’ rights as citizens of Nigeria to seek
redress in the court of law.
“All the foregoing rights mentioned
above clearly violated by the instigated mob, whose objectives
included ensuring that the court did not deliver its scheduled ruling at
12 noon and or conduct any other business thereafter and to bully,
intimidate and instill fear in the court in an attempt to obstruct
justice to the point where the court would be too apprehensive to
subsequently hear the case prior to the swearing in of Fayose on
October 16,2014.
“Should this unfortunate display of
desecration of the hallowed temple of justice which is supposed to the
last hope of the common man be allowed to persist unprosecuted, we all
would be recorded for posterity as the people who sat with arms folded
while miscreants and hooligans took over and controlled the
administration of justice and overall balance of the society.”
PDP writes CJN over Ekiti crisis
Meanwhile, the PDP in Ekiti State has
accused the Chief Judge, Justice Ayodeji Daramola, of plotting with
Governor Kayode Fayemi to stop the inauguration of Fayose.
The party made the allegation in a letter to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mariam Aloma-Mukhtar.
The letter titled, “Another judicial coup
plotted to avert the swearing in of the governor-elect of Ekiti State,”
was signed by the state Secretary of the PDP, Dr. Tope Aluko and
the Publicity Secretary, Kola Oluwawole.
But Fayemi described the allegation as
another tissue of lies by the PDP.He therefore challenged the PDP in
the state to prove its allegation.
In the letter the PDP claimed that it
was aware of plans by Daramola to give accelerated hearing to some
suits challenging the eligibility of Fayose for the June 21 governorship
election despite the notice of appeal and the stay of proceedings filed
in respect of the suits.
Fayose had challenged the assumption of
jurisdiction by Justice Olusegun Ogunyemi of an Ado-Ekiti High Court on
the matter. He also sought a stay of proceedings on the hearing of the
substantive suit.
The letter to the CJN read, “On
September 28, 2014, the governor-elect of Ekiti State personally wrote a
letter to you, raising fears about the attempts of the CJ of Ekiti
State to frustrate his inauguration.
“This was done in view of Section 185 (2)
of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which empowers only the CJ of
Ekiti State to inaugurate the governor-elect as the new governor of the
state, as Ekiti State presently has no Grand Khadi of the Sharia Court
of Appeal, or the President of the Customary Court of Appeal that can
perform similar function, in case the Chief Judge decline to do so.
“To our knowledge, you are yet to react
to that letter. Meanwhile, we are authoritatively informed of another
desperate move to obtain a “black market injunction” from an Ekiti State
High Court, restraining the CJ from inaugurating the governor-elect
on October 16, 2014.
“Our source authoritatively informed us
that the E-11 case in suits HAD/51/2014 and HAD/52/2014 are to be
given accelerated hearing between Wednesday, 8/10/14 and Friday,
10/10/14, or thereabout, in a way that a “black market injunction” will
be secured to restrain the CJ from inaugurating the governor-elect,
after the court might have been re-opened following the NJC directive.
“The outgoing governor, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, and Justice Daramola had finalised arrangement to actualise this diabolical plan.”
The PDP therefore called on the CJN to
call Daramola to order and allow due process to be followed in all the
cases before his court.
It said, “These two cases or any other
case that may be concocted are not time bound or perishable items that
injunction would be necessary to preserve ex-parte or otherwise, before
the swearing-in of the governor-elect on October 16,2014.’’
“The law allows appeal from one court of first instance to the Supreme Court. Why before the inauguaration?
“There is no doubt that this dangerous
game if allowed to germinate into fruition will cause a constitutional
crisis, and indeed, anarchy in the already volatile state.”
But the state Commissioner for Information, Tayo Ekundayo, said it was another lie by the PDP.
He said, “We don’t control the judiciary.
The three arms of government have their role to play without
interference. I do not know how the governor will ask the CJ to scuttle
the inauguration. It is not in our character.
“The PDP has been telling a lot of lies,
accusing us of so many things. There is nothing they have said in the
last three months that is true. It is just another of their lies. We are
not in any discussion with the CJ on how he runs the judiciary.”
Copyright PUNCH.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content
on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten
or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written
permission from PUNCH.
Army extends travel ban on embattled Borno, Yobe
Nigerian
army extended by 24 hours, yesterday a travel ban imposed on Borno, the
restive northeastern state worst hit by Boko Haram attacks.
Both
Borno and neighbouring Yobe state had on Friday imposed a travel ban
through the Muslim Eid holiday weekend to Monday to guard against Boko
Haram attacks.
But now the “embargo on all
vehicular movement in 7 Division area of responsibility has been
extended till 7.00am (0600 GMT) on Tuesday, 7th October, 2014,” said the
army statement, without giving further details.
The army’s 7 Division covers Borno and its surroundings.
When
it announced the initial weekend travel ban, the military had said a
security report indicated that Boko Haram militants have made plans to
launch “multiple bomb explosions” in Maiduguri and other major towns in
the state during the Muslim festival.
They
planned to use motor vehicles, tri-cycles, among others, and their
main targets include Muslim praying grounds, markets and other public
places, the army said.
The two states and Adamawa have been under a
state of emergency since May last year because of the Boko Haram
conflict and the Islamists have typically carried out strikes on Muslim
holidays.
The militants are thought to be in control of more than
two dozen towns and villages in the northeast, but the military insists
that lost ground can be regained.
- See more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/10/army-extends-travel-ban-embattled-borno-yobe/#sthash.XdectTWO.dpuf